| all papers in the search category |
| “story” in title, abstract, authors Search uses fields visible to the searcher. For example, PC member searches do not examine authors. |
| paper #119 |
| papers in the numbered set with “kernel” in title, abstract, authors |
| “802” in title, abstract, authors (not paper #802) |
| “very” and “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| the same |
| the phrase “very new” in title, abstract, authors |
| either “very” or “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| use parentheses to group |
| “very” but not “new” in title, abstract, authors |
| the same |
| words that start with “ve” in title, abstract, authors |
| words that contain “me” in title, abstract, authors |
| title contains “flexible” |
| abstract contains “very novel” |
| author list contains “poletto” |
| more than four authors |
| collaborators contains “liskov” |
| selected topics match “link” |
| paper has “Secondary Track” submission option Other option searches: “has:SouFil” and “has:PriTra” |
| same meaning; abbreviations also accepted |
| paper’s “Secondary Track” option has value “Systems” |
| tagged “discuss” (“tag:discuss” also works) |
| not tagged “discuss” |
| tagged “discuss”, sort by tag order (“rorder:” for reverse order) |
| matches any tag that starts with “disc” |
| you are a reviewer |
| “fdabek” in reviewer name/email |
| four reviewers (assigned and/or completed) |
| less than three completed reviews Use “cre:<3” for short. |
| at least one incomplete review |
| at least one in-progress review (started, but not completed) |
| at least two primary reviewers |
| at least one secondary reviewer |
| at least one external reviewer |
| “fdabek” has completed a primary review |
| has a review with less than 100 words in author-visible fields |
| review was rated positively (“rate:-” and “rate:boring” also work; can combine with “re:”) |
| at least one visible reviewer comment (not including authors’ response) |
| at least three visible reviewer comments |
| at least one reviewer comment visible to authors |
| “sylvia” (in name/email) wrote at least one visible comment; can combine with counts, use reviewer tags |
| has author’s response |
| at least two visible comments, possibly including author’s response |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) is discussion lead |
| no assigned discussion lead |
| some assigned discussion lead |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) is shepherd (“none” and “any” also work) |
| you have a conflict with the paper |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) has a conflict with the paper This search is only available to chairs and to PC members who can see the paper’s author list. |
| some PC member has a conflict with the paper |
| at least three PC members have conflicts with the paper |
| a reviewer of paper 1, 2, or 3 has a conflict with the paper |
| “fdabek” (in name/email) has preference > 0 PC members can search their own preferences; chairs can search anyone’s preferences. |
| a PC member’s preference has expertise “X” (expert) |
| paper is submitted for review |
| paper is neither submitted nor withdrawn |
| paper has been withdrawn |
| final copy uploaded |
| decision is “Rejected” (partial matches OK) |
| one of the accept decisions |
| one of the reject decisions |
| decision specified |
| decision unspecified |
| at least one completed review has Overall merit score 2 |
| other abbreviations accepted |
| other fields accepted (here, Reviewer expertise) |
| completed reviews’ Overall merit scores are in the 2–4 range (all scores between 2 and 4) |
| completed reviews’ Overall merit scores fill the 2–4 range (all scores between 2 and 4, with at least one 2 and at least one 4) |
| at least one completed review has Overall merit score greater than 2 |
| at least two completed reviews have Overall merit score less than or equal to 2 |
| at least one completed external review has Overall merit score greater than 2 |
| at least two completed PC reviews have Overall merit score greater than 2 |
| “sylvia” (reviewer name/email) gave Overall merit score 2 |
| at least one completed review has “finger” in the Paper summary field |
| other abbreviations accepted |
| at least one completed review has text in the Paper summary field |
| all reviews have Overall merit score 2 Formulas can express complex numerical queries across review scores and preferences. |
| “f” is shorthand for “formula” |
| variance in OveMer is above 0.5 |
| at least one reviewer had Overall merit score 2 and review preference < 0 |
| show tags and PC conflicts in the results |
| hide title in the results |
| show a formula |
| sort by score |
| sort by score variance |
| sort by reverse status |
| edit the values for tag “#discuss” |
| like “search1 OR search2”, but papers matching “search1” are grouped together and appear earlier in the sorting order |
| display searches in compact columns |
| search for “search1”, but highlight papers in that list that match “search2” (also try HIGHLIGHT:pink, HIGHLIGHT:green, HIGHLIGHT:blue) |